VIJAY MAHARAJ
IT IS mystifying the support shown by the TT Unified Teachers' Association in defence of the Teaching Service Commission (TSC), given its poor performance over the many years.
The non-appointment of primary school teachers by the commission obviously affects TTUTA's membership, thereby reducing monthly dues.
Recalling the nursery rhyme 'Sing a song of sixpence, A pocket full of rye, Four and 20 blackbirds, Baked in a pie,' is TUTTA hoping for four to increase to 20?
Denominational boards own/operate 70 per cent of all primary schools, so this draconian measure of starving them of teachers suggest an attempt to undermine their success.
The Education Ministry's and the minister's work to date should be applauded. Significant initiatives, innovations and interventions at all levels of the education system have been rigorously pursued. The excellent work is being severely stymied by the human resource management of the employees of the ministry. In this respect, the TSC is inflicting great harm on the education system and the nation.
Section 125 of the Constitution is at the centre of the dilemma:
"(125) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, power to appoint persons to hold or act in public office in the Teaching Service established under the Education Act, including power to make appointments on promotion and transfer and to confirm appointments, and to remove and exercise disciplinary control over persons holding or acting in such offices and to enforce standards of conduct on such officers shall vest in the Teaching Commission.'
This section of the Constitution grants almost exclusive jurisdiction and control to the TSC over the most significant element of the education system - the employees. The performance of employees is the most important component if we are to achieve a high-performing education system.
Given the poor performance of the TSC, it is incumbent on the nation to understand that it has long outlived its usefulness as envisaged: 'The framers of the Constitution had the objective of establishing non-political bodies with the sole purpose of monitoring neutral services operating on the basis of merit, free from patronage, discrimination, nepotism and injustice.'
In a contemporary education system, leadership cannot be effectively and efficiently performed by the TSC. This leadership is best exercised by the person entrusted with the responsibility and accountability of the education system - the Minister of Education. In fact, the same Constitution, Section 85 (1), also entrusts key responsibility to a minister:
'8.5 (1) Where any minister has been assigned responsibility for any department of government, he shall exercise general direction and control over that department; and, subject to such direction and control, the department shall be under the supervision of a permanent secretary whose office shall be a public office.'
It is ludicrous to demand public accountability from the minister when appointments, promotions, transfers and discipline of