Kanisa George
WHY IS IT hard to be the bigger person? Why is it hard to let go of the hurt caused by conflict and be the first to offer an olive branch?
Navigating difficult situations involving complex personalities and unbearable narratives can have a lasting impact on our lives. So, the quicker we get them behind us, the better.
Regardless of how rigid we are or firm in our stance we may be, no one wants to languish over an unsettling fallout with a best friend or a misunderstanding that turned your workspace into a war zone. Conflicts can make our lives unnecessarily complicated, and even if we do all we can to avoid them, they have a sneaky way of finding us. As much as we sometimes work hard to dodge conflict, few want to tap out once they have descended into the arena.
We exert a huge amount of effort trying to avoid conflict, but somehow can't retain the same energy to stop things when they get messy.
Are we so hung up on the issue of fault that we choose to stand on principle, or do our egos prevent us from letting go even when there is no apparent offender? Why can't we throw our gloves in and be the bigger person?
And even when we are minded to let things go, how do we differentiate between those moments when we must fiercely advocate and those when we choose to be the bigger person and move on from the situation?
In truth, the latter is not always the best course of action and vocalising your truth can, in some situations, surmount any desire to throw your hands in the air.
When you choose to be the bigger person you are actively deciding to dissolve the negative feelings surrounding the conflict and not allowing those feelings to consume you. This act of choosing to be the bigger person can bring a sense of relief and empowerment, as you take control of the situation and your emotions.
Whether you feel hurt, angry or confused, instead of allowing your emotions to consume you, being the bigger person means you choose to accept the reality of the situation.
Psychotherapist Sheri Heller shares that being the bigger person requires the "willingness to find common ground and achieve resolution, even if each person's reality differs."
Naturally, and through socialisation, we believe that any perceived wrong levied our way must be met with a resolution or retribution in our favour.
We view conflict as a game of winner-takes-all, and with our emotions at the helm, arriving at a neutral space can be near impossible, for no one wants to acknowledge defeat.
But when all is said and done, how well does this foster healthy, lasting relationships?
When faced with low-stakes conflicts that don't carry significant fallout, it might be worth letting things go even if you believe you are right.
Psychologist Christian de la Huerta believes that even when we are fundamentally right about an argument, the pleasure from winning is fleeting and ultimately not worth it, especially if the relationship is plagued with discord and mistrust.
Contrary to popular thought, choosing to be the bigger
