FINANCE Minister Colm Imbert said the government is allocating up to an extra $35 million (US$5 million) for unforeseen costs on the new terminal at the ANR Robinson International Airport in Tobago, on top of $17.5 million (US$2.5 million) already agreed.
He addressed a briefing at his ministry in Port of Spain on December 6, after he had addressed the issue at a post-Cabinet briefing the day before at Whitehall, Port of Spain.
At both occasions, he denied allegations by the opposition of huge cost overruns of hundreds of millions of dollars. Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar stood her ground on the claims in a statement on December 6.
At his latest briefing, Imbert blamed the actual extra costs on delays – caused respectively by the covid19 pandemic and by the process of land acquisition – and on the need to amend the airport design to strengthen it against climate change inclusive of some retrofitting of structures.
Imbert gave reporters a letter by international programme managers Gleeds TT Ltd saying ongoing revisions of costs and time-lines were entirely appropriate for complex schemes.
The contract awarded by Nidco to China Railway Construction Co Ltd to build the airport was about $918 million (US$134 million), according to Cabinet Note 2199 dated November 2024. This note also listed $27 million paid to CEP Ltd for oversight and supervision services and $47 million to Nidco as project management fees.
Imbert scoffed at the opposition's claims that Nidco's first consultant engineer, CEP, had been fired due to any alleged unwillingness to be a rubber stamp on decisions made by China Railway. Instead he said CEP's initial contract had come to the end of its contracted period and for a second contract their quoted price had allegedly been too high, upon which another firm was engaged – Arun Buch and Associated Ltd – followed by KS&P. He said CEP had approved a non-objection to China Railway's initial design done using incumbent international standards but these had been upgraded to counter climate change as advanced by Arun Buch.
Imbert said the upgraded design catered for climate change effects such as increased wind sheer on the building. "The building is more robust than intended."
Reading a letter dated December 6 from Nidco to himself, Imbert noted project delays due to covid19 and land acquisition.
He also quoted Nidco saying Buch had considered the airport design to be too physically flexible and in need of reinforcement. Buch had cited the extensive curtain wall, height of the building, roof's wave profile, extensive eave overhang and tall masonry walls sitting on suspended floors.
Building A's and Building B's foundations plus Building A's structure had to be retrofitted for which the employer (Nidco) had agreed to pay China Rail compensation. However for Building B's and Building C's structural designs and Building C's foundation, China Railway claimed compensation but that claim has not yet been decided, the Nidco letter said.
Otherwise, an explanation for the $17.5
